Andrea Stone
Senior Washington Correspondent
WASHINGTON (Dec. 21) — The polls are clear: A majority of Americans don’t like the health care ideas proposed by Democrats in Congress.
Now, if only they knew what those ideas were. The Pew Research Center reports that 69 percent say health reform is hard to understand.
“It’s a very complicated set of propositions for people to make judgments about because there’s a fair amount of misinformation,” said Pew Center President Andrew Kohut. “Even the policy wonks have trouble with this stuff.”
It is tough to keep up with a 2,000-page bill that lawmakers have tried to change with amendments that themselves run into the hundreds of pages. Especially when senators cast crucial votes in the dead of night in the middle of a blizzard and the holiday season.
Back in July, before lawmakers turned their full attention to health care, a Gallup poll found two in three doubted members of Congress had a good understanding of the issue. Nearly half, however, said they had the issue figured out. Still, the majority admitted they did not have a good grasp of the details.
Top presidential adviser David Axelrod appeared confident Sunday on ABC’s “Good Morning America” that, “reality, I think, will trump poll numbers in the dead of winter as this debate is going on.”
Frank Newport, editor-in-chief of Gallup, said it could take months and more likely years for that reality to sink in and for Americans to really know how they like the changes being made to their health care.
“The White House is sensitive to the fact they’re doing something against the majority’s will,” he said. “They’re saying that as time goes on, people will appreciate it is the right thing to do, which is basically saying, ‘We know more than the public.’ And that gets into another philosophical debate – whether Congress should lead or reflect the public will.”
Theodore Marmor, a public policy professor at Yale University’s School of Management who helped create Medicare for seniors in the 1960s, said polls on health care are meaningless because most of the public doesn’t understand the issue. “Principled congressional actors will discount polls that have almost nothing to do with the facts of the legislation,” he said. “Opinions have been shaped by sound bites, distortions, misrepresentations and in some cases outright lies.”
Or, just as likely, by political affiliation. Newport and other pollsters note a sharp partisan divide when it comes to health care. In the latest Gallup survey, more than three in four Democrats support the Senate bill, while 83 percent of Republicans oppose it. Independents are more evenly split, with 49 percent opposed and 44 percent in favor.
Democratic leaders “know it’s not popular with the general public but it is popular with Democrats,” said Harvard health policy professor Robert Blendon. “If they fail to get a bill enacted, it will … show they are incapable of leading the country” when they control both the White House and Congress.
Republican pollster Frank Luntz said voters understand all too well the debate under way on Capitol Hill and will make their opinions clear in the 2010 elections. “Americans want health care reform, but not this health care reform,” he said.
As the Senate prepares for a final vote on Christmas Eve, Luntz predicts the legislation will get the votes it needs “regardless of what the public thinks.”
“On health care, we’re not on the 1-yard line but we are on the 20-yard line, and it’s close enough that Obama can kick a field goal.”
Topics: health care
Should Congress lead, or reflect the public will? The objective has become blurred. The objective, and name, started out as Health Insurance Reform. Now…the objective is “pass the bill at ANY cost”.
I believe Democrats fear what Robert Blendon stated in the article above, “If they fail to get a bill enacted, it will … show they are incapable of leading the country” when they control both the White House and Congress.
This administration has yet to provide any indication that they are capable of leading such a monumental initiative. I REALLY doubt they know what they’re doing. I simply don’t trust them to do the right thing, for the right reason, and to do it efficiently.
Please…someone name a few programs that have been implemented since inauguration that can be labeled a success.
I answered your question once before, Frio…
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_has_President_Barack_Obama_done_so_far
Maybe next time you guys should actually make some helpful suggestions, rather than spend the next four or eight years filibustering any and every Democratic initiative that comes to the table. Talk about people securing their votes by quite literally doing -nothing-!
Since it looks like someone has tampered with that wiki since last I visited (protesters come in all shapes after all), here are some other, less FoxNewsy answers…
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/rulings/promise-kept/
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/rulings/in-the-works/
http://www.whatisobamadoing.com/2009/05/20/so-what-has-obama-really-done-so-far/
PP13, I followed your first link. Put it this way, I encourage readers to follow the link and read the “accomplishments”. I started to write something about each bullet, then I thought you might be joking.
Then I followed your second link. Well Obama certainly has made some progress. Below I’ve listed a few Obama accomplishements provided by your second link.
* Expand the Senior Corps volunteer program.
* Expand funding to train primary care providers and public health practitioners
* Increase funding to expand community based prevention programs
* Sign the UN Convention to the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
* Assure that the Veterans Administration budget is prepared and ‘must-pass’ legislation (imagine that).
* Appoint a special advisor to the president on violence against women
* Direct military leaders to end war in Iraq (please)
* Send 2 additional brigades to Afghanistan (after how many months)
* Give a speech at a major Islamic forum in the first 100 days of administration
* Grant Americans unrestricted rights to visit family and send money to Cuba
* Release Presidential records
* Require new hires to sign a form affirming their hiring was not due to political affiliation or contributions (like Van Jones or all the rest)
I give up!